AMD’s flagship 16-core $699 Ryzen 9 7950X and entry-level six-core $299 Ryzen 5 7600X are the bookend fashions within the new Ryzen 7000 “Raphel” lineup, and so they take main spots on our record of Greatest CPUs and our CPU Benchmark hierarchy with Intel-beating efficiency in almost each class, together with gaming and functions.
Intel’s hybrid Alder Lake processors caught AMD flatfooted, taking the lead in each efficiency and worth at each value level. The Ryzen 7000 processors fireplace again with the brand new Zen 4 structure, which AMD claims will increase IPC by 13%, etched on the TSMC 5nm course of. That combo delivers unbelievable peak clocks of 5.7 GHz — a rise of 800 MHz that marks a report for AMD’s Ryzen household. It’s additionally surprisingly the next clock velocity than we see with even Intel’s quickest chips, not less than till the corporate’s 6 GHz Raptor Lake chips come to market.
| Worth | Cores / Threads (P+E) | Base / Increase Clock (GHz) | Cache (L2+L3) | TDP / Max | Reminiscence | |
| Ryzen 9 7950X | $699 | 16 / 32 | 4.5 / 5.7 | 80MB | 170W / 230W | DDR5-5200 |
| Ryzen 9 7900X | $549 | 12 / 24 | 4.7 / 5.6 | 76MB | 170W / 230W | DDR5-5200 |
| Ryzen 7 7700X | $399 | 8 / 16 | 4.5 / 5.4 | 40MB | 105W / 142W | DDR5-5200 |
| Ryzen 5 7600X | $299 | 6 / 12 | 4.7 / 5.3 | 38MB | 105W / 142W | DDR5-5200 |
Paired with vastly improved energy supply, which comes courtesy of a brand new platform, AMD’s course of and structure advances ship really explosive efficiency good points. AMD’s new chips drop into the brand new AM5 socket, which the corporate has dedicated to supporting till 2025, on 600-series motherboards. The brand new platform comes replete with assist for the newest interfaces, like DDR5 and PCIe 5.0, largely matching Intel’s connectivity choices. AMD has even give you its personal EXPO DDR5 reminiscence profiles for overclocking, rivaling Intel’s XMP commonplace. The Ryzen 7000 chips additionally come loaded with different new tech, like a brand new Radeon RDNA 2 iGPU for primary show output, and assist for AVX-512 and AI directions.
Picture 1 of 6
As a fast preview of our intensive exams beneath, the flagship Ryzen 9 7950X makes unbelievable good points — it’s as much as 15% quicker at gaming, 21% quicker in single-threaded work, and 45% quicker in threaded work than its predecessor, setting a brand new bar for the highest-end mainstream chips. In truth, the $3,299 Threadripper Professional 5975WX is simply 17% quicker than the 7950X in threaded work, nevertheless it prices nearly six occasions extra. That’s to not point out that the 7950X beats the Core i9-12900K throughout the board.
The Ryzen 5 7600X is equally spectacular, delivering as much as 18% quicker gaming efficiency than its predecessor in tandem with 25% and 34% good points in single- and multi-threaded work, respectively, ushering in a brand new unmatched stage of efficiency on the $300 value level.
Each chips beat Intel’s flagship in gaming. Nevertheless, as spectacular as they’re, they aren’t excellent: The Zen 4 Ryzen 7000 sequence has a excessive $300 entry-level value level and solely helps dear DDR5 reminiscence as an alternative of together with less-expensive DDR4 choices like Intel. That muddies the worth proposition as a result of costly general platform prices. AMD additionally dialed up energy consumption drastically to spice up efficiency, inevitably leading to extra warmth and a extra power-hungry system. You do find yourself with extra performance-per-watt, although.
Ryzen 7000 takes the lead in convincing trend, however its actual competitor, Raptor Lake, doesn’t come till subsequent month. Intel claims its personal spectacular efficiency good points of 15% quicker single-threaded, 41% quicker threaded, and a 40% ‘general’ efficiency acquire, that means we’ll see an in depth battle for desktop PC management. Within the meantime, right here’s how the present chips stack up. (Make sure to try our full increase, thermals, energy, and IPC testing after the benchmarks.)
Ryzen 9 7950X and Ryzen 5 7600X Specs and Pricing
As a reminder, the Ryzen 7000 processors include the N5 TSMC 5nm course of node for the core compute die (CCD) and the TSMC 6nm course of for the I/O Die (IOD).
| Worth | Cores / Threads (P+E) | Base / Increase Clock (GHz) | Cache (L2/L3) | TDP / PBP / MTP | Reminiscence | |
| Ryzen 9 7950X | $699 | 16 / 32 | 4.5 / 5.7 | 80MB (16+64) | 170W / 230W | DDR5-5200 |
| Ryzen 9 5950X | $546 ($799 debut) | 16 / 32 | 3.4 / 4.9 | 74MB (8+64) | 105W | DDR4-3200 |
| Core i9-13900K / KF | ? | 24 / 32 (8+16) | 3.0 / 5.8 | 64MB (32+36) | 125W / 253W | DDR4-3200 / DDR5-5600 |
| Core i9-12900K / KF | $589 (Ok) – $564 (KF) | 16 / 24 (8+8) | 3.2 / 5.2 | 44MB (14+30) | 125W / 241W | DDR4-3200 / DDR5-4800 |
| Ryzen 9 7900X | $549 | 12 / 24 | 4.7 / 5.6 | 76MB (12+64) | 170W / 230W | DDR5-5200 |
| Ryzen 7 7700X | $399 | 8 / 16 | 4.5 / 5.4 | 40MB (8+32) | 105W / 142W | DDR5-5200 |
| Ryzen 5 7600X | $299 | 6 / 12 | 4.7 / 5.3 | 38MB (6+32) | 105W / 142W | DDR5-5200 |
| Ryzen 7 5600X | $199 ($299 debut) | 6 / 12 | 3.7 / 4.6 | 35MB (3+32) | 65W | DDR4-3200 |
| Core i5-13600K / KF | ? | 14 / 20 (6+8) | 3.5 / 5.1 | 44MB (20+24) | 125W / 181W | DDR4-3200 / DDR5-5600 |
| Core i5-12600K / KF | $289 (Ok) – $264 (KF) | 10 / 16 (6+4) | 3.7 / 4.9 | 29.5MB (9.5+20) | 125W / 150W | DDR4-3200 / DDR5-4800 |
That is how Ryzen 7000 stacks up in opposition to Intel’s present Alder Lake chips, together with info that we’ve collected about Intel’s yet-to-be-fully-announced Raptor Lake. Remember that the Raptor Lake specs within the above desk are usually not but official.
The 16-core 32-thread Ryzen 9 7950X is $100 lower than the unique launch pricing of the Ryzen 9 5950X. AMD additionally saved the entry-level pricing on the similar $299 with the Ryzen 5 7600X, which is a excessive bar for entry to the Ryzen 7000 household. Conversely, Intel has stated that it’ll improve its chip pricing as a consequence of financial elements, so we’ll have to attend to see its official pricing to guage the 7600X’s positioning.
AMD didn’t improve core counts with the Ryzen 7000 household — as an alternative, it targeted on architectural and course of node enhancements that ship extra efficiency per core. The corporate additionally labored on enhancing its energy supply to unleash extra efficiency, which we’ll dive right into a bit later.
The $699 16-core Ryzen 9 7950X comes with a 4.5 GHz base and 5.7 GHz increase, with the latter being the very best increase frequency of the 4 preliminary Ryzen 7000 processors. The chip comes with 16 MB of L2 cache, a doubling over the prior-gen fashions, and 64MB of L3 cache. This chip has a 170W TDP score and a max energy draw of 230W, the very best energy consumption of any Ryzen chip but. The 7950X vies with Intel’s Core i9-12900K for now, however it should ultimately face the Core i9-13900K that may include eight extra effectivity cores for a complete of 24 cores.
The $399 6-core Ryzen 5 7600X has a 4.7 GHz base and 5.3 GHz increase clock. This chip has 6MB of L2 cache, double that of its predecessor, and 32MB of L3. The Ryzen 5 7600X has a 125W TDP score and a peak energy draw of 181W, marking a brand new excessive for Ryzen 5. The 7600X will compete with the Core i5-12600K for now, however the Core i9-13600K ought to arrive subsequent month with an extra 4 e-cores, for a complete of 14 cores.
The Raphael processors drop into a brand new AM5 socket that helps the PCIe 5.0 and DDR5 interfaces, matching Alder Lake on the connectivity entrance. The Socket AM5 motherboards can expose as much as 24 lanes of PCIe 5.0 to the person.
Ryzen 7000 helps DDR5-5200 if you happen to set up one DIMM per channel (1DPC), however that drops to DDR5-3600 for 2DPC. AMD additionally launched its personal new reminiscence overclocking spec to compete with Intel’s XMP. The brand new EXPO profiles are similar to the prevailing XMP profiles that we’re accustomed to, however they’re designed particularly for AMD processors, permitting one-click reminiscence overclocking to predefined speeds. AMD has partnered with the most important reminiscence distributors to create EXPO kits, and the corporate expects 15 or extra to be accessible at launch with speeds reaching as much as DDR5-6400. As earlier than, AMD additionally helps ECC reminiscence by default, however implementation is as much as the motherboard vendor.
The Ryzen 9 7950X and Ryzen 7 7600X don’t include bundled coolers. AMD recommends a 240-280mm liquid cooler or equal for Ryzne 9 processors. In the meantime, you’ll want a mid-frame tower cooler (or equal) for the Ryzen 7 and 5 fashions. You need to anticipate loaded temperatures to recurrently attain 90C, which is inside spec and gained’t harm the chip.
| Yr / Processor | Peak Frequency | Frequency Achieve | Course of, Structure |
| 2017 – Ryzen 7 1800X | 4.1 GHz | – | 14nm Zen 1 |
| 2018 – Ryzen 7 2700X | 4.3 GHz | +200 MHz / +5% | 12nm Zen+ |
| 2019 – Ryzen 9 3950X | 4.7 GHz | +400 MHz / +9% | 7nm Zen 2 |
| 2020 – Ryzen 9 5950X | 4.9 GHz | +200 MHz / +4% | 7nm Zen 3 |
| 2022 – Ryzen 9 7950X | 5.7 GHz | +800 MHz / +16% | 5nm Zen 4 |
Right here we will see AMD’s development in clock charges over the Ryzen period. As you possibly can see, the 800 MHz improve in clock speeds with the 7000 sequence processors marks the most important single acquire in Ryzen’s historical past. For now, AMD has the very best official clock velocity available on the market, however Intel says that Raptor Lake may have a peak 6 GHz clock fee. That may seemingly arrive on an expensive KS particular version mannequin, however Intel hasn’t stated when it should come to market.
This technology of chips finds the chipmakers once more embroiled in a frequency battle, with each chipmakers pushing their shopper chips to the very best clocks we have seen with their fashionable choices. That additionally brings increased energy consumption, so we additionally see increased TDP figures from each chipmakers as they improve frequencies.
Naturally, we’ve to view the elevated energy consumption by means of the prism of how a lot performance-per-watt the processor offers, and right here AMD has made huge strides courtesy of the structure and course of node enhancements. We’ll present extra element within the energy consumption part.
Picture 1 of 13
As earlier than, the Ryzen 9 processors include two Core Compute Die (CCD) whereas the Ryzen 5 processors include one. Every 5nm die homes eight cores, measures 70mm^2, and has 6.5 billion transistors.
AMD’s new 6nm I/O Die (IOD) ties all of it collectively. The 122mm^2 die homes 3.4 billion transistors and comes armed with a newcomer to Ryzen — an built-in graphics engine.
The RDNA 2 iGPU is designed to offer primary show output capabilities, and AMD says you shouldn’t anticipate it to assist any significant gaming. The RDNA 2 iGPU comes with two compute models, 4 ACE, and 1 HWS, in order that must be fairly obvious. We tried a number of video games anyway, which you’ll be able to see if you happen to flip by means of the album above, and the outcomes weren’t fairly. We couldn’t get Far Cry 6 to load, as an illustration, and Shadow of the Tomb Raider may render the benchmark at 1280×720 however wouldn’t run at 1080p. Very like Intel’s graphics, we have been handled to a slideshow within the few video games that did run.
The built-in graphics do have enchantment for troubleshooting and OEM programs, although, and it has a number of different redeeming qualities. The iGPU helps AV1 and VP9 decode, H.264 and HVEC encode and decode, USB Sort-C with DisplayPort Alt Mode, DisplayPort 2.0 (adaptive sync, DSC, UHBR10, HDR), and HDMI 2.1 (HFR, 48Gbps FRL, DSC, HDR10+, and VRR). You additionally get assist for 4K60 and hybrid graphics.
Socket AM5 and 600-series Motherboards
AMD’s socket AM4 has served for 5 years throughout 5 CPU generations, 4 architectures, 4 course of nodes, 125+ processors, and 500+ motherboard designs. Now it is time for a brand new socket, AM5, which AMD has dedicated to supporting by means of ‘2025+.’
AMD’s AM5 strikes from its long-lived Pin Grid Array (PGA) AM4 sockets to a Land Grid Array (LGA) structure. Regardless of the fully completely different LGA1718 socket interface (1718 pins), the AM5 socket will nonetheless assist AM4 coolers. The AM5 socket measures 40x40mm, and the Ryzen 7000 chips adhere to the identical size, width, Z-height, package deal dimension, and socket keep-out sample because the previous-gen fashions, enabling backward assist for AM4 coolers. AMD says all however 5% of present coolers will work with out new brackets (which cooler makers sometimes present free).
The X670 and X670E chipsets shall be accessible at launch, whereas B650E and the B650 will arrive in October. AMD says that motherboard pricing will drop as little as $125, however hasn’t clarified if that constitutes pricing for X- or B-series boards. We’ve an intensive roundup of 20 600-series motherboards and a breakdown of the chipset connectivity choices right here.
Ryzen 9 7950X and Ryzen 5 7600X Benchmark Check Setup
We examined the Ryzen 7000 processors with an ASRock X670E Taichi motherboard. We examined all Intel configurations with DDR5 reminiscence, however you could find efficiency information for DDR4 configurations in our CPU Benchmark hierarchy. We additionally examined with safe boot, virtualization assist, and fTPM/PTT lively to replicate a correctly configured Home windows 11 set up.
Our overclocks have been slightly simple — we enabled the auto-overclocking Precision Increase Overdrive (PBO) function with ‘superior motherboard’ settings and adjusted the scalar setting to 10X. For our overclocked configurations, we enabled the DDR4-6000 EXPO profile for the reminiscence equipment. This additionally mechanically allows the AMD-recommended Auto setting for the material and a 1:1 ratio for the reminiscence frequency and reminiscence controller (Auto:1:1 is the beneficial setting for reminiscence overclocking with Ryzen 7000). You could find additional particulars within the desk on the finish of the article.
Gaming Efficiency on Ryzen 9 7950X and Ryzen 5 7600X — The TLDR
We’re leaping to recreation testing outcomes right here, however make sure to try our IPC and energy testing after the applying benchmarks.
Beneath you possibly can see the geometric imply of our gaming exams at 1080p and 1440p, with every decision break up into its personal chart. Remember {that a} completely different mixture of recreation titles may yield considerably completely different outcomes (notably with the Ryzen 7 5800X3D), however this serves as a stable general indicator of gaming efficiency. As ordinary, we’re testing with an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 to scale back GPU-imposed bottlenecks as a lot as doable, and variations between take a look at topics will shrink with lesser playing cards or increased resolutions. You will discover additional game-by-game breakdowns beneath.
Picture 1 of 4
The $699 Ryzen 9 7950X takes second place in its inventory configuration with a 5% lead over Intel’s quickest gaming chip, the Core i9-12900K. The 7950X is one other ~2% quicker after overclocking the cores and reminiscence, primarily tying the overclocked 12900K. This marks an enormous generational enchancment — the Ryzen 9 7950X is 17% quicker than its prior-gen counterpart, the Zen 3-powered Ryzen 9 5950X, which additionally comes with 16 cores. Nevertheless, Intel solely wants to achieve ~5% with Raptor Lake to match the 7950X in gaming, setting the stage for fairly the competitors subsequent month.
The $299 Ryzen 5 7600X is 12% quicker than the $289 Core i5-12600K, with the lead narrowing to six% after overclocking each chips. Extra impressively, the inventory 7600X is 4% quicker than Intel’s flagship Core i9-12900K, bringing a brand new stage of worth to the $300 value level — with the caveat that you simply’ll need to cope with increased platform prices.
Notably, the 12900K is ~7% quicker than the 7600X in our 1080p 99th percentile measurements, a good indicator of smoothness. The 7600X’s lead over the 12600K additionally drops to ~4%. Nevertheless, we don’t see any egregious outliers within the 99th percentile measurements that may considerably alter our general impressions of the rankings you see within the common fps chart.
The Ryzen 5 7600X additionally sports activities an enormous generational uplift of 18% over the Ryzen 5 5600X, which was as soon as the darling of mid-range gaming builds. Raptor Lake appears attractive within the mid- and low-end value ranges from afar, however the 7600X will go an extended solution to shoring up AMD’s defenses. It’s also possible to tune the 7600X and eke out an additional ~3% of efficiency, however as at all times, good points will fluctuate by title and by the standard of your chip.
The $300 Ryzen 5 7600X represents the entry-level for Zen 4, not less than for now, however the Ryzen 9 7950X prices greater than twice as a lot and is simply 2% quicker in gaming. Which means the 76000X is an distinctive worth for gaming, and as per ordinary with Ryzen 9 chips, the 7950X is actually for individuals who want prosumer-class efficiency in functions.
AMD’s personal $430 Ryzen 7 5800X3D stays the quickest gaming chip available on the market by a good margin, however this highly-specialized chip comes with caveats — its 3D V-Cache would not increase efficiency in all video games. Moreover, the 5800X3D is optimized particularly for gaming, however it may’t maintain tempo with similarly-priced chips in productiveness functions. AMD will carry not less than one Zen 4-powered Ryzen 7000 processor with 3D V-cache to market this yr, so that you would possibly wish to think about ready a number of extra months if you happen to’re after a specialised gaming chip of this ilk.
Naturally, the variations between the chips shrink once we swap over to 1440p and convey a GPU bottleneck into play, however the story stays largely comparable, with scant variations between the chips on the high of the leaderboard. The competitors between Intel and AMD is even nearer now, so it is best to make an knowledgeable choice based mostly on the forms of titles you play regularly.
3D Mark DX11, DX12, and Chess Engines on AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and Ryzen 5 7600X
Picture 1 of 4
Artificial benchmarks do not are inclined to translate properly to real-world gaming, however they do present us the uncooked quantity of compute energy uncovered to recreation engines. It is too unhealthy most video games do not totally exploit it.
The Ryzen 9 7950X is ~25% quicker than the Core i9-12900K and the previous-gen 5950X within the DX11 CPU exams. The Ryzen 5 7600X is ~19% quicker than the 5600X, barely beating the Core i5-12600K whereas bringing a brand new stage of efficiency to Ryzen 5.
The DX12 exams are additionally spectacular for Ryzen 7000 — the Ryzen 9 7950X leads the 5950X by 27% whereas the 7600X notches a 20% enchancment over the 5600X — however Intel’s price-comparable chips nonetheless maintain the lead. The Core i9-12900K is 14% quicker than the 7950X, whereas the 12600K is 32% quicker than the 7600X.
The heavily-threaded chess engine benchmarks additionally revenue from Ryzen 7000’s improved multi-threaded efficiency. The 7950X simply beats the 12900K by giant margins in each exams, whereas the 7600X improves Ryzen 5’s standing in opposition to Core i5.
Far Cry 6 on AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and Ryzen 5 7600X
Picture 1 of 2
The Ryzen 7 5800X3D takes the general lead, which we’ll see rather a lot as we flip by means of these titles, however do not forget that this chip will be finicky — some titles see little to no uplift.
The Ryzen 5 7600X and Ryzen 9 7950X are spectacular on this sequence of exams with a ~21% lead over their prior-gen counterparts. In addition they stack up properly in opposition to Alder Lake, with the 7600X being 15% quicker than the 12600K, and the 7950X taking a 6% lead over the 12900K.
We see roughly the anticipated uptick from overclocking the Ryzen 7000 fashions, however you’ll discover the Alder Lake chips undergo from decrease 99th percentile measurements after tuning. That’s an attention-grabbing and repeatable situation, nevertheless it appears to be confined to this title in our suite.
F1 2021 on AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and Ryzen 5 7600X
Picture 1 of 4
The Ryzen 7000 chips take the highest of the chart in general framerates, however like their prior-gen counterparts, they’ve proportionally decrease 99th percentile framerates than the Alder Lake processors. We didn’t discover any outwardly seen tough play and we’re framerates in extra of 300 fps, so that is extra of an attention-grabbing tendency than one thing that manifests as noticeably poor efficiency.
The Zen 4 chips take an enormous lead over the inventory Intel comparables, with the 7950X being 16% quicker than the 12900K and the 7600X taking a 20% lead over the 12600K. The Intel chips revenue extra from overclocking on this title than the Ryzen 7000 fashions, gaining roughly 10% whereas the brand new Ryzen chips acquire round 5%. Once more, this doesn’t matter a lot when peaks hit 300+ fps.
Hitman 3 on AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and Ryzen 5 7600X
Picture 1 of 2
Intel used to get pleasure from a sizeable lead over Ryzen in Hitman 3 as a result of the sport is particularly tuned to leverage the E-cores successfully by offloading low-priority duties like physics to the small cores. That modifications with Ryzen 7000 because it takes the lead over Intel once more, however the deltas between the price-comparable chips aren’t as pronounced as we see in opposition to the previous-gen Ryzen chips. For example, the 7950X is 25% quicker than the 5950X and the 7600X is 37% quicker than the 5600X.
Horizon Zero Daybreak on AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and Ryzen 5 7600X
Picture 1 of 4
Horizon Zero Daybreak doesn’t scale exceptionally properly with extra host processing energy, so like most of the titles you’ll see in the actual world, the delta between the highest-end chips will be slight.
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2021 on AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and Ryzen 5 7600X
Picture 1 of 2
The Ryzen 7 5800X3D is solely excellent on this title, highlighting that the chip can present big speedups in some titles. Nevertheless, that may skew general rankings. For this reason the chip is, on common, the quickest gaming chip on the earth, however bear in mind that may change drastically based mostly on the sport you’re enjoying.
The inventory 7950X and 7600X lead the 12900K and 12600K by ~14%. The Intel 12900K and 12600K revenue closely from overclocking, gaining 19% and 16%, respectively, whereas the Ryzen 7000 chips acquire roughly 5% from tuning. Regardless of Alder’s huge overclocking good points, the tuned Ryzen chips land inside a number of p.c of their price-comparable opponents.
Purple Lifeless Redemption 2 on AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and Ryzen 5 7600X
Picture 1 of 4
The 7950X leads the 12900K by 8%, whereas the 7600X continues to impress with very comparable efficiency to its way more costly counterpart. It’s additionally 14% quicker than the 12600K.
Watch Canine Legion on AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and Ryzen 5 7600X
Picture 1 of 4
Watch Canine Legion brings a much-needed win for the 12900K as we shut out our gaming benchmarks. Nevertheless, the 12900K’s 2% lead over the 7950X is slim. In the meantime, the 7600X is 6% quicker than the 12600K.
Desktop PC Utility Benchmarks on Ryzen 9 7950X and Ryzen 5 7600X — The TLDR:
Picture 1 of 2
It ought to come as no shock that the Ryzen 9 7950X completely dominates our cumulative measurement of multi-threaded efficiency, however the delta is spectacular nonetheless. The 7950X is a whopping 44% quicker than the Core i9-12900K, and overclocking does little to shut the gulf between the chips. The 7950X can be 45% quicker than the 5950X, dwelling as much as AMD’s efficiency claims.
For perspective, the beastly $3,299 Threadripper Professional 32-core Ryzen 9 5975WX is simply 17% quicker than the 7950X on this similar cumulative measurement. Nevertheless, it prices 5 occasions extra, highlighting simply how distinctive this quantity of threaded horsepower is on a mainstream PC platform. This in all probability has one thing to do with AMD’s choice to not carry a Zen 3-powered HEDT platform to market.
That’s a troublesome act for the 7600X to observe, particularly on condition that the Core i5-12600K is a number of share factors quicker in threaded work. That comes on the energy of the 12600K’s e-cores, and overclocking extends the 12600K’s result in 10%. In both case, the Ryzen 5 7600X nonetheless marks a stable generational enchancment for Ryzen, as it’s 34% quicker than the prior-gen Ryzen 5 5600X.
Intel’s Alder Lake took a pronounced lead in single-threaded efficiency over the prior-gen Ryzen 5000 processors, however the Zen 4 structure takes an enormous step ahead, barely edging out the price-comparable Alder Lake chips. In our cumulative measurement of single-threaded efficiency, the Ryzen 9 7950X and 7600X successfully tie the Core i9-12900K and 12600K, respectively, leveling the enjoying area.
You’ll discover that the overclocked configurations supply little to no profit for the Ryzen processors, as anticipated, whereas each Intel processors truly lose some efficiency on this metric. It isn’t shocking to see the 12900K lose a tad — the all-core 5.1 GHz overclock is decrease than its peak 5.2 GHz boosts on a single core — however the 12600K’s decline is a bit surprising as a result of the overclock matches its peak clock fee. After fairly a bit of research and repeated testing, it seems that thread concentrating on isn’t working as successfully with the overclocked Intel configurations, leading to fairly a little bit of thread migration throughout single-threaded duties. We’re nonetheless troubleshooting this difficulty, however the outcomes are repeatable so we’re together with them.
Rendering Benchmarks on AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and Ryzen 5 7600X
Picture 1 of 12
It was initially shocking to see Alder Lake’s hybrid structure largely beat Ryzen in threaded workloads after AMD had dominated most of these benchmarks for years, however the Ryzen 9 7950X quashes that rebellion — not less than till Raptor Lake arrives.
For example, the 7950X is 40% and 21% quicker than the 12900K within the multi-threaded Cinebench and POV-Ray benchmarks, exhibiting that Ryzen 9’s benefit isn’t small. We see a good greater distinction within the Blender renders, the place the 7950X is from 55% to 63% quicker than the 12900K, and overclocking the Intel chip isn’t sufficient to vary the image.
The 12900K fares higher in single-threaded Cinebench nevertheless it nonetheless trails the 7950X barely. The Zen 4 structure reveals nice good points over the Zen 3 chips within the single-threaded POV-Ray benchmark, however Alder Lake maintains the lead — the 12900K is 14% quicker than the 7950X.
Turning to the Core i5-12600K vs Ryzen 5 7600X battle, we see that Core i5 both matches or exceeds the 7600X in almost each rendering benchmark, be it single- or multi-threaded. Other than the LuxMark and POV-Ray benchmarks, many of the deltas between the 2 chips in threaded workloads aren’t overly giant.
Encoding Benchmarks on AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and Ryzen 5 7600X
Picture 1 of 9
Most encoders are typically both closely threaded or nearly solely single-threaded, however Ryzen 7000 takes the lead in each forms of functions.
The Ryzen 9 7950X and Ryzen 5 7600X take significant leads within the single-threaded LAME, WebP, and FLAC encoders. The 7950X additionally dominates the threaded HandBrake and SVT-AV1 benchmarks, however right here we see the 7600X and the 12600K once more locked in a good battle that may go both manner relying upon the benchmark.
Adobe Premiere Professional, Photoshop and Lightroom on AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and Ryzen 5 7600X
Picture 1 of 4
We have built-in the UL Benchmarks Procyon exams into our suite to switch the growing older PCMark 10. This new benchmark runs advanced Adobe Premiere Professional, Photoshop, and Lightroom workflows with the precise software program, making for an awesome real-world take a look at suite.
The Ryzen 7000 chips beat Alder Lake handily in Premiere Professional and your complete Lightroom and Photoshop benchmark, although the Ryzen 5 and Core i5 chips are extra carefully matched within the Lightroom batch processing sub-test.
Net Looking, Workplace and Productiveness on AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and Ryzen 5 7600X
Picture 1 of 9
The ever-present internet browser is among the most regularly used functions. These latency-sensitive exams are typically evenly threaded, so a quick response time is crucial. Intel sometimes dominates these benchmarks, however Ryzen 7000 flips the tables and takes the lead in each browser take a look at. The Utility Begin-up benchmark compares how lengthy it takes to open numerous functions, thus serving as an awesome measure of system snappiness. Ryzen 7000 goes an extended solution to enhancing AMD’s efficiency right here.
Compilation, Compression, AVX-512 Efficiency on AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and Ryzen 5 7600X
Picture 1 of 20
This number of exams runs the gamut from the exceedingly branchy code within the LLVM compilation workload to the massively parallel molecular dynamics simulation code in NAMD to encryption and compression/decompression efficiency.
Y-cruncher computes Pi with the AVX instruction set, making for an exceedingly demanding benchmark. We employed the newest model of y-cruncher that has added assist for Zen 4, and right here we will see the advantages of AVX-512 change into obvious within the single-threaded benchmark. Spreading the workload out among the many cores within the threaded portion of the y-cruncher take a look at reduces the magnitude of the lead over Intel (per-core reminiscence throughput and/or material throughput are seemingly limitations right here), however each Ryzen 7000 chips take a tangible lead over Alder Lake. Much more importantly, we see that this represents an enormous generational improve over the Zen 3-equipped Ryzen 5000 chips.
We’re accustomed to Ryzen displaying bipolar efficiency in compression/decompression workloads, with decompression being a energy whereas compression suffered in comparison with different chips. The Zen 4 structure makes huge strides right here, delivering unbelievable efficiency in each workloads with the Ryzen 9 7950X. Understandably, the good points aren’t as giant with the 7600X, however we nonetheless see a way more balanced efficiency profile than we’ve seen with prior-gen Ryzen chips.
The Ryzen 9 7950X takes a pronounced lead over the Core i9-12900K within the NAMD benchmark, however the Ryzen 5 7600X can’t maintain tempo with the 12600K. We see that very same pattern play out within the LLVM Compilation benchmark, which bodes properly for the 7950X as we head into our suite {of professional} benchmarks.
Workstation CPU and GPU Benchmarks Check Notes
A few of these functions additionally make an look in our commonplace take a look at suite, however these take a look at configurations and benchmarks are targeted on a typical desktop-class setting. In distinction, the next exams are configured to emphasize the programs with workstation-class workloads. As a result of these are extra oriented to prosumer/skilled use instances, we restricted our take a look at pool to the Ryzen 9/Core i9 and Ryzen 7/Core i7 processors.
We loaded down our take a look at platforms with 64GB of DDR4 reminiscence unfold throughout 4 modules to accommodate the expanded reminiscence capability required for a number of of those workstation-focused duties. We used the formally supported inventory reminiscence speeds for 2DPC configurations. Notably, the Ryzen 7000 chips assist ECC reminiscence by default, although motherboard distributors need to certify their very own implementations. Intel’s Alder Lake additionally helps ECC reminiscence, however solely on its workstation-focused W-series motherboards.
Adobe Premiere Professional and Lightroom and Benchmarks on AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
Puget Techniques is a boutique programs vendor that caters to skilled customers with custom-designed programs focused at particular workloads. The corporate has developed a sequence of acclaimed benchmarks for Adobe software program, which you could find right here.
Picture 1 of 3
The Photoshop benchmark gauges efficiency in a various vary of duties, measuring the time taken to finish basic duties and apply filters. This take a look at leans closely on GPU acceleration, and it is clear that prime clock charges profit efficiency tremendously. The 7950X is 5% quicker than the 12900K at inventory settings, and 15% quicker after tuning. It’s additionally 22% quicker than the prior-gen 5950X.
The Ryzen 9 7950X is much more spectacular in Puget’s Adobe After Results benchmark, taking an 8% lead over the 12900K at inventory settings and increasing to a 13% lead after overclocking. The 7950X can be 29% quicker than the 5950X. As soon as once more, we see the Core i9-12900K take a step backward after overclocking.
SPECworkstation 3 Benchmarks on AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
The SPECworkstation 3 benchmark suite is designed to measure workstation efficiency in skilled functions. The total suite consists of greater than 30 functions break up amongst seven classes, however we have winnowed down the record to exams that largely focus particularly on CPU efficiency. We have not submitted these benchmarks to the SPEC group, so these are usually not official benchmarks.
Picture 1 of 11
The Calculix workload is predicated on the finite ingredient methodology for three-dimensional structural computations, and it sometimes responds properly to each increased core counts and clocks. The 7950X leads right here the place Ryzen 9 trailed earlier than, exhibiting yet one more spectacular velocity up.
SPECworkstation 3’s Rodinia LifeSciences benchmark steps by means of 4 exams that embrace medical imaging, particle actions in a 3D area, a thermal simulation, and image-enhancing applications. The 5950X dominates these heavily-threaded workloads,
The earth’s subsurface construction will be decided by way of seismic processing. One of many 4 primary steps on this course of is the Kirchhoff Migration, which generates a picture based mostly on the accessible information utilizing mathematical operations. Threaded horsepower comes into play, and as soon as once more, we see the 7950X take the lead.
Zen 4 Microarchitecture and IPC Measurements
Picture 1 of 14
AMD says the Zen 4 structure is an iterative advance over Zen 3, however Zen 5, which arrives in 2024, shall be a ground-up redesign. Zen 4 has loads of developments, although. As you possibly can see all through the album above, AMD made a number of advances, however widening the entrance finish to higher feed the execution models and enhancing department prediction account for 60% of the IPC acquire. AMD additionally elevated the op-cache by 1.5x, moved to a two-branch-per-cycle prediction, improved the load/retailer models, and doubled the L2 cache capability. The elevated L2 cache capability ends in an extra 2 cycles of L2 latency and provides 4 cycles to L3 latency. AMD says this elevated latency isn’t too detrimental as a result of the elevated cache capability offers increased hit charges that largely offset the penalty.
AMD has enabled assist for AVX-512 directions, giving it a curious benefit over Intel, which pioneered the SIMD directions however ended up disabling them with Alder Lake. AMD describes its AVX-512 implementation as a ‘double-pumped’ execution of 256-bit extensive directions. Which means that it truly takes two clock cycles to execute an AVX-512 instruction. Nevertheless, this offers compatibility with AVX-512 and nonetheless boosts efficiency. This strategy additionally saves die space and defrays the frequency and thermal penalties sometimes related to Intel’s processors once they execute AVX-512 workloads. AMD’s implementation ends in decrease throughput per clock than Intel’s methodology, however the increased clocks clearly offset not less than among the penalty. AMD says AVX-512 offers a 30% improve in multi-core FP32 workloads over Zen 3 and a 2.5X speedup for multi-core int8 operations. As we noticed in our personal benchmarks, the strategy offers vital efficiency uplift.
AMD says the online impact of its Zen 4 architectural enhancements is a 13% improve in IPC over Zen 3. AMD additionally claims to ship higher energy effectivity in a a lot smaller package deal than Intel’s Alder Lake processors. The corporate in contrast its Zen 4 core to Intel’s Golden Cove to focus on that it’s half the dimensions at 3.84mm2, but wrings out 47% extra energy effectivity.
Picture 1 of 8
Measuring IPC is hard, largely as a result of it varies based mostly on the workload. AMD calculated its 13% IPC enchancment from 22 completely different workloads, together with gaming, which appears a curious addition as a consequence of doable graphics-imposed bottlenecks. AMD additionally included some multi-threaded workloads. AMD’s outcomes present that the IPC enhancements fluctuate, with enhancements spanning from 39% in wPrime to a 1% enchancment within the CPU-z benchmark.
We examined a restricted subset of single-threaded workloads to see the clock-for-clock enhancements, locking all chips to a static 3.8 GHz all-core clock with the reminiscence dialed into the formally supported switch fee. As you possibly can see, Zen 4 does ship stable IPC enhancements in a large number of workloads. The y-cruncher and Geekbench 5 crypto scores expertise slightly disproportionate good points, however that comes on account of Zen 4’s assist for AVX-512. Nevertheless, as we noticed within the single- and multi-threaded y-cruncher benchmarks, this efficiency doesn’t scale linearly to increased core loadings.
Energy Consumption and Effectivity Ryzen 9 7950X and Ryzen 5 7600X
AMD labored with TSMC to tune the 5nm course of for its design objectives, leading to a specialised 15-layer N5 course of node. Sadly, we don’t know the specifics of the {custom} node. Nevertheless, TSMC’s N5 usually offers 15% extra efficiency at a given energy stage, or 20% decrease energy consumption at any given clock fee in comparison with the 7nm course of that AMD used for its previous-gen Ryzen 5000 chips. Paired with the Zen 4 architectural advances and SoC enhancements, AMD says Ryzen 7000 delivers as much as 40% extra performance-per-watt at its commonplace TDP ranges.
| 65W TDP | 105W TDP | 170W TDP | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Socket Energy (PPT) Watts | 88W | 142W | 230W |
| Peak Present (EDC) Amps | 150A | 170A | 225A |
| Sustained Present (TDC) Amps | 75A | 110A | 160A |
AMD has outlined a brand new 170W TDP vary, a brand new excessive for the mainstream Ryzen household. AMD has additionally elevated the bottom TDP for the Ryzen 9 fashions by 65W and elevated Ryzen 5 by 45W. Moreover, the height energy consumption (PPT) for the AM5 socket is now 230W. That is a major improve over the previous-gen Ryzen 5000’s 142W restrict.
AMD additionally elevated the TDC and EDC amperage considerably, elevating EDC by 60A and 30A for the 65W and 105W TDP ranges, respectively. We see smaller 15A will increase to the EDC for each the 65W and 105W TDP tiers.
AMD says that it improved the platform energy interface from SVI2 to SVI3, permitting it to maneuver from two variable energy rails to 3, thus enabling higher management of the facility supply to the socket. The SVI3 interface offers steady and extra correct telemetry for voltage, present, energy, and temperature for a number of onboard voltage regulators, whereas SVI2 didn’t permit monitoring of energy and temperature. SVI3 additionally allows enhanced energy states that assist save energy, like section shifting (shutting off phases when not wanted).
Picture 1 of 4
The fruits of those energy supply enhancements is that AMD can unlock increased ranges of efficiency that stretch past IPC good points. Above we plotted the clock velocity for the Ryzen 9 7950X and previous-gen 5950X on the left-hand facet of the chart as we slowly loaded the cores with a Prime95 SSE workload (this attracts extra peak energy than the AVX exams). As you possibly can see, the 7950X maintained 5 GHz with all cores loaded, however the 5950X dropped to three.4 GHz.
We additionally plotted the facility on the right-hand facet of the chart. As you possibly can see, the Ryzen 9 5950X reached its peak energy consumption with six cores loaded, after which energy plateaued till we loaded ten cores. It then started to say no as we labored our manner as much as loading all 16 cores. This can be a recognized tendency for the 5950X – socket energy limitations apparently resulted in uneven energy/voltage supply at increased energy ranges, thus requiring the chip to dial again its frequency after reaching a sure threshold.
In distinction, the Ryzen 9 7950X continues to eat rising quantities of energy till 12 cores are loaded. Energy consumption solely declines barely after that, and the clock reductions are far much less extreme. The top result’s increased clock frequencies throughout almost all loading circumstances, which helps allow the huge efficiency boosts we noticed in our take a look at suite.
Picture 1 of 9
As anticipated, our energy measurements discover the Ryzen 7000 chips drawing considerably extra energy than the previous-gen Ryzen 5000 fashions, and that’s by design. Regardless of Ryzen’s gen-on-gen improve in energy consumption, Intel’s Alder Lake processors nonetheless eat extra energy whereas delivering much less efficiency.
The renders-per-day-per-watt charts present that the Ryzen 5 7600X is way extra energy environment friendly than the Ryzen 5 5600X within the x264 HandBrake workload, however the inventory Ryzen 9 7950X principally matches the prior-gen Ryen 9 5950X. Nevertheless, as we all know from our benchmarks, the 7950X is far quicker than the 5950X on this particular workload, which we will see beneath.
Right here we take a barely completely different have a look at energy consumption by calculating the cumulative vitality required to carry out x264 and x265 HandBrake workloads, respectively. We plot this ‘process vitality’ worth in Kilojoules on the left facet of the chart.
These workloads are comprised of a hard and fast quantity of labor, so we will plot the duty vitality in opposition to the time required to complete the job (backside axis), thus producing a very helpful energy chart.
Do not forget that quicker compute occasions, and decrease process vitality necessities, are splendid. Which means processors that fall the closest to the underside left nook of the chart are the perfect. It’s clear that the Ryzen 7000 processors take one other huge step ahead in energy effectivity.
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X Increase Frequencies, Energy, and Thermals
Picture 1 of 3
As a part of our regular take a look at routine, we examined efficiency in lightly-threaded work to report the height increase speeds and thermals. We ran by means of our commonplace sequence of lightly-threaded exams (LAME, PCMark10, Geekbench, VRMark, and single-threaded Cinebench).
As with the previous-gen chips, some Ryzen 7000 chips can increase above their rated speeds if they’ve enough cooling and energy. As at all times, the silicon lottery may apply. The Ryzen 9 7950X recurrently peaked at 5.85 GHz, above the rated 5.7 GHz, exhibiting that AMD is once more being conservative with its peak increase clock estimates.
We additionally ran by means of a spate of ordinary closely threaded functions (Cinebench, HandBrake, POV-Ray, Blender, AVX-heavy y-cruncher) to measure energy and thermals. We used a Corsair H115i 280mm AIO with the followers cranked to 100% to maintain the chip as cool as doable throughout this take a look at run.
The 7950X hovered round 5.2 GHz by means of some workloads however dropped to five.0 GHz when all cores have been totally loaded. Peak energy consumption reached 231W, which naturally generates fairly a bit of warmth. The 7950X recurrently hit 95C in the course of the take a look at run, which AMD assures us is predicted conduct – the chip is designed to eat all accessible thermal headroom to offer quicker efficiency. The 95C thermal threshold is inside secure working limits, so it gained’t lead to degradation.
It’s usually forgotten, however the Ryzen 5000 processors additionally function similarly. By design, Intel’s newest chips additionally usually run at 100C for prolonged durations. Each distributors are locked in an intense competitors for efficiency management, so we will anticipate this pattern to proceed.
Because of these aggressive ways, extra highly effective coolers can usually extract much more efficiency. We performed an experiment to see if the 280mm AIO cooler resulted in constrained efficiency by using our 720mm {custom} loop to check the Ryzen 9 7950X at each inventory and PBO settings. As you possibly can see within the remaining slide, we acquired the identical efficiency with the {custom} loop in our multi-threaded take a look at suite as we did with our 280mm AIO, so its secure to say a 280mm is enough – not less than if you happen to’re prepared to dwell with the followers operating at 100% throughout heavy work.
Conclusion
AMD’s Ryzen 9 7950X and Ryzen 5 7600X ship spectacular efficiency good points that beat Alder Lake in most forms of workloads, together with gaming. The Ryzen 9 7950X stands out because the quickest productiveness chip for mainstream programs available on the market, whereas the Ryzen 5 7600X units a brand new bar for gaming chips on the $300 value level.
Beneath, we’ve the geometric imply of our gaming take a look at suite at 1080p and 1440p and a cumulative measure of efficiency in single- and multi-threaded functions. We performed our gaming exams with an RTX 3090, so efficiency deltas will shrink with lesser playing cards and better decision and constancy settings.
Picture 1 of 6
The $699 Ryzen 9 7950X is 5% quicker in gaming than Intel’s Core i9-12900K, however this chip is actually designed for the productivity-minded. The 7950X was 44% quicker than the Core i9-12900K in our multi-threaded exams, making it essentially the most highly effective desktop PC chip presently accessible. The Zen 4 structure additionally closes the hole with Alder Lake in single-threaded functions, addressing a very obtrusive deficiency in opposition to Alder Lake.
The Ryzen 7 7600X was 12% quicker than the Core i5-12600K in our gaming exams, however much more impressively, it beat the Intel Core i9-12900K by 4%. That makes it an distinctive gaming chip on the $300 value level. The Core i5-12600K maintains a slight lead in multi-threaded work, however the deltas aren’t giant sufficient to miss the 7600X’s quicker efficiency in gaming and lightly-threaded work.
AMD’s 600-series motherboards supply fashionable connectivity choices, like DDR5 and PCIe 5.0, and in addition carry different components, like USB4, to bear. The Ryzen chips additionally now function an iGPU that’s enough for a primary show out, which is a vital step ahead.
The Ryzen 7000 chips do have a number of hang-ups, although. The Ryzen 7000 chips eat fairly a bit extra energy than their predecessors, however AMD turns that into further efficiency that cuts by means of work faster. Intel’s high-end chips are additionally designed to run at increased ranges of energy consumption, and thus warmth, so this tactic is turning into widespread.
AMD’s choice to completely decide to DDR5 might be a legal responsibility if pricing stays increased than DDR4. In distinction, Intel’s Alder Lake platform helps both DDR4 or DDR5, offering a cheaper path that’s notably enticing within the $300 and beneath value vary. At the moment, you’ll pay roughly $50 to $70 extra for 16GB of DDR5 than you’ll for DDR4, and that premium will increase in lockstep with capability, that means you’ll pay much more for 32GB kits. Nevertheless, bear in mind that DRAM pricing is risky, so that you’ll have to test present pricing. AMD says it expects DDR5 pricing to enhance as we enter the final a part of the yr, however this market will be unpredictable – notably if the Ryzen 7000 launch causes a sudden spike in DDR5 gross sales.
The DDR5 uncertainty looms giant, however not as giant because the uncertainty round Raptor Lake. Intel has made assured efficiency claims of a 15% enchancment in single-threaded, 41% enchancment in threaded, and a 40% ‘general’ efficiency acquire, which signifies that Raptor Lake and Ryzen 7000 might be carefully matched. Raptor Lake is rumored to return to market in mid- to late-October, so it could be finest to attend and see what Intel has to supply, particularly on the pricing entrance, earlier than pulling the set off.
If you happen to’re useless set on shopping for a chip now, the Ryzen 7 7600X is certainly the quickest gaming chip available on the market for $300. It provides principally the identical gaming efficiency because the 7950X that’s now the quickest ‘commonplace’ gaming chip available on the market, however at lower than half the associated fee. In the meantime, the Ryzen 9 7950X is the reigning general efficiency champ for mainstream PCs, delivering unprecedented ranges of efficiency on a mainstream platform.
| AMD Socket AM5 (X670E) | Ryzen 9 7950X, Ryzen 5 7600X |
| ASRock X670E Taichi | |
| G.Talent Trident Z5 Neo DDR5-6000 – Inventory: DDR5-5200 | OC/PBO: DDR5-6000 | |
| Intel Socket 1700 DDR4 (Z690) | Core i9-12900K, i7-12700K, 15-12600K, i5-12400 |
| MSI MEG Z690 Ace | |
| G.Talent Trident Z5 DDR5-6400 – Inventory: DDR4-4400 | OC DDR4-6000 | |
| AMD Socket AM4 (X570) | Ryzen 9 5950X, 5900X, 5700X, 5600X, 5800X3D |
| MSI MEG X570 Godlike | |
| 2x 8GB Trident Z Royal DDR4-3600 – Inventory: DDR4-3200 | OC/PBO: DDR4-3800 | |
| All Techniques | Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3090 Eagle – Gaming and ProViz functions |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti FE – Utility exams | |
| 2TB Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus, Silverstone ST1100-TI, Open Benchtable, Arctic MX-4 TIM, Home windows 11 Professional | |
| Cooling | Corsair H115i, Customized loop |
| Overclocking observe | All configurations with overclocked reminiscence even have tuned core frequencies and/or lifted energy limits. |
