Solely Chris, proper? You’ll wish to view this in a Chromium browser:
That is precisely the kind of factor I like, not for its practicality (cuz it ain’t), however for the way it illustrates an idea. Usually, tutorials and demos attempt to comply with the “guidelines” — no matter these could also be — but breaking them helps you perceive how a sure factor works. That is a kind of.
The idea is fairly easy: one goal factor could be connected to a number of anchors on the web page.
<div class="anchor-1"></div>
<div class="anchor-2"></div>
<div class="goal"></div>
We’ve gotta register the anchors and fasten the .goal
to them:
.anchor-1 {
anchor-name: --anchor-1;
}
.anchor-2 {
anchor-name: --anchor-2;
}
.goal {
}
Wait, wait! I didn’t connect the .goal
to the anchors. That’s as a result of we’ve got two methods to do it. One is utilizing the position-anchor
property.
.goal {
position-anchor: --anchor-1;
}
That establishes a target-anchor relationship between the 2 parts. But it surely solely accepts a single anchor worth. Hmm. We’d like greater than that. That’s what the anchor()
perform can do. Nicely, it doesn’t take a number of values, however we are able to declare it a number of occasions on completely different inset properties, every referencing a unique anchor.
.goal {
prime: anchor(--anchor-1, backside);
}
The second piece of anchor()
‘s perform is the anchor edge we’re positioned to and it’s gotta be some kind of bodily or logical inset — prime
, backside
, begin
, finish
, inside
, exterior
, and many others. — or proportion. We’re bascially saying, “Take that .goal
and slap it’s prime
edge towards --anchor-1
‘s backside edge.
That additionally works for different inset properties:
.goal {
prime: anchor(--anchor-1 backside);
left: anchor(--anchor-1 proper);
backside: anchor(--anchor-2 prime);
proper: anchor(--anchor-2 left);
}
Discover how each anchors are declared on completely different properties by the use of anchor()
. That’s rad. However we aren’t truly anchored but as a result of the .goal
is rather like another factor that participates within the regular doc movement. We’ve to yank it out with absolute positioning for the inset properties to take maintain.
.goal {
place: absolute;
prime: anchor(--anchor-1 backside);
left: anchor(--anchor-1 proper);
backside: anchor(--anchor-2 prime);
proper: anchor(--anchor-2 left);
}
In his demo, Chris cleverly attaches the .goal
to 2 <textarea>
parts. What makes it intelligent is that <textarea>
means that you can click on and drag it to alter its dimensions. The 2 of them are completely positioned, one pinned to the viewport’s top-left edge and one pinned to the bottom-right.
If we connect the .goal's prime
and left
edges to --anchor-1
‘s backside
and proper
edges, then connect the goal's backside
and proper
edges to --anchor-2
‘s prime
and left
edges, we’re successfully anchored to the 2 <textarea>
parts. That is what permits the .goal
factor to stretch with the <textarea>
parts when they’re resized.
However there’s a small catch: a <textarea>
is resized from its bottom-right nook. The second <textarea>
is positioned in a approach the place the resizer isn’t straight connected to the .goal
. If we rotate(180deg)
, although, it’s all good.
Once more, you’ll wish to view that in a Chromium browser on the time I’m penning this. Right here’s a clip as a substitute for those who choose.
That’s only a background-color
on the .goal
factor. We are able to put a bit character in there as a substitute as a background-image
like Chris did to shine this off.
Enjoyable, proper?! It nonetheless blows my thoughts that is all taking place in CSS. It wasn’t many days in the past that one thing like this could’ve been a job for JavaScript.